Porn mag rant about the general direction of the industry:
11:43 p.m. 2006-10-17

Through buying different porn mags over the years I have been finding unfortunately that all the so called sex mags are so vanilla except 4 Hustler which as far as I am concerned is the only one worthly of buying. Sorry Sexyatheist that your Penthouse is going that way. I bought Swank in 05 similarly because Silvia Saint was on the front cover and the spread was as phoned in as it could get. Zero penetration! At least they could have given my a picture of Silvia pentrating her pussy with her finger. Not even that!

Unfortunately this did not hold true for Hustler's website which is so unhustler like. The site is a big pile of shit. Low-res videos that are streamed to you. You cannot even save to your harddrive not even if you wanted to and you won't. I cancelled my subscription the same day it was that bad!

Consevative porn anyone? or should I call it Republican porn? Is there anything as boring? I think I heard some one from one of the mags or industry saying that they cannot beat the extreme nature of Hustler's smut so they are going the other way. Face it! You are scared of these conservative goons and their scare tatics. They will shut my down is what you fear.

But from a product positioning point of view how can all these sex mags differentiate themselves from their competitors if they are all so similar? 1 Straight hetrosexual spread if you are lucky and minimal penetration. Most or all of the penetration is implied. If I have to use my imagination in order to picture pussy penetration I would not buy your magazine in the first place.

What will shut most of these magazines down before the politicians ever get to them is the fact that they are mediocure at best as far as product quality is concerned and customers will just vote no with their wallets or purses in the case of sexyatheist.